Members
All in all, 923 youngsters taken care of immediately the newest COBADI dos.0 questionnaire (Desk 1). The brand new try consisted primarily of females (81.2%), more youthful (median years = (5.2), minute. = 17, max. = 50), along with their first year at the college or university (fifty.2%). Bayesian inference lets us learn inequitable samples with regards to gender whilst allows the addition of the newest research having programming later on. The fresh questionnaire are lead electronically in order to youngsters learning Societal Education and you may Personal Works (Universidad Pablo de- Olavide) and you may Pedagogy (UNED) from inside the academic ages and you may . There had been zero constraints towards the involvement, and no financial otherwise informative extra was available to engage contained in this investigation.
Abilities
With the George and Mallery (2003) classification, we found that the questionnaire had a high degree of overall reliability (? Cronbach = .83 (.81–.85), Guttman’s ?6 = .86). We also found a high degree of reliability in the subscale “Competences in the use of ICT for the search and treatment of information” (? Cronbach = .85 (.85–.89), Guttman’s ?6 = .87), moderate reliability in the subscale “Interpersonal competences in the use of ICT at university” (not considering items based on a preference scale, ? Cronbach = .65 (.58–.7), ?6 Guttman’s ?6 = .59), and moderate reliability in the scale “Virtual and social communication tools at university” (? Cronbach = .62 (.56–.68), Guttman’s ?6 = .51). The general descriptive results show (Table 3) that the vast majority of students have access to an Internet connection (98.2%). The time spent on the Internet is distributed among the following activities: university work (68.3%), use of social networks (63.9%) and listening to music (53.3%). It is significant that 77.8% stated that they never use Internet for gaming online, and 50.1% never use it to make new friends.
On results for “Competences throughout the use of ICT into the search and you will procedures of data”, i note that each other men and women college students end up being he’s got a amount of skills regarding the entry to “search engines”, “browsers”, “electronic cartography” and you can “podcasting”. The equipment they normally use that have quicker promise try “QR codes” together with creation of “on line demonstrations”. Gender improvement is actually obvious throughout the usage of “digital cartography”, with a good Bayes basis regarding , and therefore implies that the details is actually times likely to are available throughout the hypothesis one to says there’s an improvement between male and you can female college students compared to brand beste tyske datingside new hypothesis off equal skills ranging from the brand new sexes. This proves that’s very strong otherwise decisive proof for the rather have out of a change between people, which have a sized effect of .34 (.17, .51). Hence, discover proof the men students possess higher sensed skills during the digital cartography than the feminine youngsters. This impact try suffered into the introduction regarding a previous shipping with an enthusiastic r factor of just one.5 (Bayes grounds = , very good or decisive research). When it comes to proficiency when you look at the “on the internet demonstrations”, the results show good Bayes factor off eight.30, and this reveals that the information try eight.29 minutes expected to appear in the fresh theory that there are a significant difference ranging from male and female people than in brand new hypothesis regarding equal competence within sexes. This indicates that there is positive or large proof of an effective difference in the male and you will female pupils, which have a sized effectation of .twenty eight (.ten, .45). Thus, there can be research that the dudes possess greater detected ability within the development “on the internet presentations” compared to female. It impression are suffered when in addition to an earlier delivery with an roentgen parameter of just one.5 (Bayes foundation = 5.36), given that shown in Fig. step one.
